Saturday, December 15, 2012

Bobby Jindal: Oral contraceptives should be ... - Big Health Report

10491062-mmmainGov. Bobby Jindal said oral contraceptives should be available over-the-counter in a Thursday evening op-ed for the Wall Street Journal. The self-described ?unapologetic pro-life Republican? governor of Louisiana said this would lower health-care costs, prevent government intrusion into citizens? lives and fight the influence of big pharmaceutical companies.

?As a conservative Republican, I believe that we have been stupid to let the Democrats demagogue the contraceptives issue and pretend, during debates about health-care insurance, that Republicans are somehow against birth control,? Jindal said in the op-ed.

Jindal cited a December committee opinion from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists which came out in favor of over-the-counter access to the pill ?to improve contraceptive access and use and possibly decrease unintended pregnancy rates.?

Although the op-ed might seem like a shift to the left for the Catholic governor, Jindal also reiterated his conservative reasoning behind his support for the issue.

Post Continues on www.nola.com


Source: http://bighealthreport.com/6135/bobby-jindal-oral-contraceptives-should-be-available-over-the-counter/

braveheart earthquake california earthquake california roy orbison the third man 2012 nfl draft order mohamed sanu

With Rice withdrawing, Kerry may get call

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Susan Rice, the embattled U.N. ambassador, abruptly withdrew from consideration to be the next secretary of state on Thursday after a bitter, weekslong standoff with Republican senators who declared they would fight to defeat her nomination.

The reluctant announcement makes Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry the likely choice to be the nation's next top diplomat when Hillary Rodham Clinton departs soon. Rice withdrew when it became clear her political troubles were not going away, and support inside the White House for her potential nomination had been waning in recent days, administration officials said.

In another major part of the upcoming Cabinet shake-up for President Barack Obama's second term, former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska now is seen as the front-runner to be defense secretary, with official word expected as soon as next week.

For the newly re-elected president, Rice's withdrawal was a sharp political setback and a sign of the difficulties Obama faces in a time of divided and divisive government. Already, he had been privately weighing whether picking Rice would cost him political capital he would need on later votes.

When Rice ended the embarrassment by stepping aside, Obama used the occasion to criticize Republicans who were adamantly opposed to her possible nomination.

"While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character," he said.

"I am saddened we have reached this point," Rice said.

Obama made clear she would remain in his inner circle, saying he was grateful she would stay as "our ambassador at the United Nations and a key member of my Cabinet and national security team." Rice, too, said in her letter she would be staying.

Clinton, in a brief statement, said that Rice had "been an indispensable partner over the past four years" and that she was confident "that she will continue to represent the United States with strength and skill."

Rice had become the face of the bungled administration account of what happened in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012 when four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, were killed in what is now known to have been a terrorist attack.

Obama had defiantly declared he would chose her for secretary of state regardless of the political criticism, if he wanted, but such a choice could have gotten his second term off to a turbulent start with Capitol Hill.

In a letter to Obama, Rice said she was convinced the confirmation process would be "lengthy, disruptive and costly." The letter was part of a media rollout aimed at upholding her reputation. It included an NBC News interview in which she said her withdrawal "was the best thing for our country."

"Those of you who know me know that I'm a fighter, but not at the cost of what's right for our country," she tweeted later.

Rice may end up close to Obama's side in another way, as his national security adviser should Tom Donilon move on to another position, though that is not expected imminently. The security adviser position would not require Senate confirmation.

Rice would have faced strong opposition from Senate Republicans who challenged her much-maligned televised comments about the cause of the deadly raid on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Her efforts to satisfy Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Kelly Ayotte and Susan Collins in unusual, private sessions on Capitol Hill fell short. The Republicans emerged from the meetings still expressing doubts about her qualifications.

"The position of secretary of state should never be politicized," Rice said. "As someone who grew up in an era of comparative bipartisanship and as a sitting U.S national security official who has served in two U.S. administrations, I am saddened that we have reached this point."

Attention now shifts to Kerry, who came close to winning the presidency in 2004 and has been seen as desiring the State job. In a statement, he made no mention of his own candidacy but praised Rice, who was an adviser to him his in his presidential bid.

Kerry was an early backer of Obama and was under consideration to become his first secretary of state. Obama has dispatched Kerry to foreign hot spots on his behalf. Kerry played the role of Republican Mitt Romney during Obama's presidential debate preparations this year.

The longtime senator would be almost certain to be easily confirmed by his colleagues on Capitol Hill.

If Obama taps Kerry for State, the president will create a potential problem for Democrats by opening a Senate seat ? one that recently defeated Republican Sen. Scott Brown is eyeing. Brown had been elected as Massachusetts' other senator in January 2010 after Democrat Ted Kennedy died, stunning the political world as he took the seat held by Kennedy for decades. Brown lost that seat in the November election.

House Democratic women had cast the criticism of Rice as sexist and racist ? she is African-American ? and some expressed disappointment with the news.

"If judged fairly based solely on her qualifications for the job, she would've made an extraordinary secretary of state," said Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif., a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Rice did not have a strong relationship with members of the Senate. Graham, who is the top Republican on the Appropriations subcommittee that handles foreign aid and the State Department, said he barely knew her.

In a brief statement, a spokesman for McCain said the senator "thanks Ambassador Rice for her service to the country and wishes her well. He will continue to seek all the facts surrounding the attack on our consulate in Benghazi."

Rice's decision comes ahead of the anticipated release next week of a report by an Accountability Review Board into the attack on the Benghazi mission. The report ordered by Clinton, focuses on the run-up to and the actual attack and is not expected to mention Rice's role in its aftermath.

Clinton is to testify about the report before Congress next Thursday.

At issue is the explanation Rice offered in a series of talk show appearances five days after the attack in Libya.

Rice has conceded in private meetings with lawmakers that her initial account ? that a spontaneous demonstration over an anti-Muslim video produced in the U.S. triggered the attack ? was wrong, but she has insisted she was not trying to mislead the American people. Information for her account was provided by intelligence officials.

She reasserted that position in an opinion piece published late Thursday on The Washington Post's website, adding, "In recent weeks, new lines of attack have been raised to malign my character and my career. Even before I was nominated for any new position, a steady drip of manufactured charges painted a wholly false picture of me. This has interfered increasingly with my work on behalf of the United States at the United Nations and with America's agenda."

Hagel, a former Republican senator from Nebraska, is a Vietnam veteran, served two terms in the Senate and was a senior member of the Foreign Relations Committee. Obama and Hagel became close while they served in the Senate and traveled overseas together. Hagel has been critical of his party since leaving the Senate in 2008, saying the GOP had moved too far right.

___

Associated Press writers Donna Cassata, Ken Thomas, Matthew Lee and Matthew Daly contributed to this story.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/embattled-rice-bows-running-kerry-likely-004318813.html

121212 Concert cbs news foxnews meteor shower Jenni Rivera chase Adam Lanza Facebook

Friday, December 14, 2012

Kanye West Wears Skirt for 12-12-12 Concert Performance

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2012/12/kanye-west-wears-skirt-for-12-12-12-concert-performance/

ohio state basketball collateral dick cheney heart umf peter frampton elite eight stephon marbury

Hamas stages first West Bank march since 2007

NABLUS, West Bank (AP) ? The Islamic militant group Hamas staged on Thursday its first public demonstration in the West Bank since 2007, illustrating its improving ties with the rival Fatah movement after a five-year rift.

The show of force by Hamas reflected the group's popularity in Palestinian society following an eight-day battle against Israel last month and its rising influence as Islamists rise to power across the region.

Hamas said about 5,000 supporters of the Islamic militant group took to the streets in Nablus after prayers Thursday.

Marchers chanted, "Hamas ? you are the guns; we are the bullets," and, "Hamas, fire more rockets on Tel Aviv." Some women held models of the rockets Gaza militants fired at Israeli cities in last month's fighting.

Hamas' influence was also on display in the city of Hebron, where thousands of supporters turned out for the funeral of a teenager killed by Israeli border police officers a day earlier. The police say he brandished a weapon, which later turned out to be fake.

Hamas members have been subjected to both Israeli and Palestinian crackdowns since the Islamic militant group seized power in the Gaza Strip five years ago, leaving the Palestinians' Western-backed president, Mahmoud Abbas, in control only of the West Bank.

But the two rival factions have made gestures toward each other following an eight-day Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip last month and Abbas' successful bid at the United Nations to win international recognition of a de facto Palestinian state.

"Hamas steadfastness and victory in Gaza was a big victory for all Palestinian people," Amin Makboul, a Fatah leader, said in a speech at Thursday's rally in Nablus.

Lack of progress in peace talks with Israel and Hamas' perceived victory in recent fighting has made the Islamic militant group among Palestinians.

Thousands of Palestinians marched through the streets of Hebron on Thursday, chanting anti-Israel slogans and waving green Hamas flags during a funeral procession for a teenager killed a day earlier in this volatile West Bank city.

Dozens of youths clashed with Israeli soldiers throughout the day, throwing stones and bottles. Troops responded with volleys of tear gas and rubber bullets. No serious injuries were reported.

Wednesday's shooting of 17-year-old Mohammed Suleima has raised tensions in Hebron, where several hundred ultra-nationalist Jewish settlers live in heavily fortified enclaves in the midst of more than 180,000 Palestinians.

The shooting occurred near a holy site known to Jews as the Cave of the Patriarchs and to Muslims as the Ibrahimi Mosque. Tradition holds that it is the place where their shared patriarch, Abraham, or Ibrahim to Muslims, bought a burial plot.

Israel's paramilitary border police force said officers shot Suleima after he threatened them with a gun that only later turned out to be fake.

The officer said in an Israeli TV interview Thursday that she shot the youth when she saw him pull out a gun and press it to the temple of another officer. The TV report said that Palestinian activists put up posters in Hebron calling on the public to kill her.

Relatives of Suleima said he was unarmed.

Some 5,000 people joined Thursday's funeral procession, praising God and vowing revenge. "Our blood will redeem the martyr," the crowd chanted.

Suleima's body was wrapped in a green Hamas shroud as it was carried on a stretcher through the streets. Dozens of people held green Hamas flags aloft during the procession. Suleima's family is known to support Hamas, and his brother was released last year in a prisoner swap between Hamas and Israel that freed an Israeli soldier held for five years in Gaza.

___

Nasser Shiyoukhi contributed reporting from Hebron.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/hamas-stages-first-west-bank-march-since-2007-174353003.html

google stock google stock china gdp dont trust the b in apartment 23 johnny damon kirk cameron news 10

One of you two gets sacked; you choose who

10 hrs.

You could call it the ?Hunger Games? approach to layoffs ? one that?s getting a big thumbs-down from workplace experts.

The Kansas City Star recently told two of its journalists,?Karen Dillon and Dawn Bormann,?that only one of them could keep her job --?and the employees themselves would have to decide who should leave the company, according to the media blog JimRomenesko.com.

Dillion?confirmed the report in an e-mail to NBC News, but did not provide any more details. The investigative reporter has worked for the Kansas City Star since 1991, according to her LinkedIn profile.

Bormann?did not answer an e-mail seeking comment. She reportedly?is leaving the company, according to KC Confidential, a blog that covers Kansas City issues.?

On Monday,?Mi-Ai Parrish, president and publisher of the Kansas City Star, announced in a memo to?staffers?a new round of layoffs -- the third since she joined the company in 2011,?according to MediaKC, a blog that covers media issues.

In a statement e-mailed to NBC News late Wednesday,?Parrish said the paper was cutting its workforce by 17 positions.

"These are always difficult decisions, so we will on occasion allow employees to volunteer for a severance package when we are reducing in areas where there are two or more of the same types of positions," Parrish said.

She added that if an employee in a group does not volunteer, "then the person with the least amount of tenure is included in the severance program."

Parrish declined further comment on personnel decisions.

Workplace experts said it?s practically unheard of for a company to take this approach when deciding who to terminate ? for good reason.

?I would strongly caution any organization from insourcing layoff decisions to the employees. There?s a reason why they pay people in leadership positions more than they pay their direct reports,? said Bob Kelleher, CEO of The Employee Engagement Group and author of the new book ?Creativeship: A Novel For Evolving Leaders.?

?Leaders should be held accountable for making those tough decisions,"?Kelleher said. "I don?t believe it should be the employees who are put in a position to make those decisions.?

Companies sometimes ask workers to step forward in a voluntary layoff situation, but pitting one person against another is not the way to go, said Nan Russell, host of the ?Work Matters? radio show and author of ?The Titleless Leader.??

?Personally, I think it?s very appalling that individuals would be in that kind of situation -- not only from the emotional standpoint for them to have to make that decision, but also for what happens to the people who are left behind and their now lack of respect for the leaders in that organization,? she said.

Management usually has guidelines when it comes to layoffs, whether the call is made based on performance or other factors, Russell said. Employees, in turn, expect that their leaders will make fair, tough decisions, and when they do, they earn workers? respect and trust.

But making two people choose who will be the one to leave indicates someone lacked the courage to make the choice, she added. That can create problems beyond the pain of the employees involved.

?Not only are they going to feel terrible no matter what the decision is, but the people left behind are, too, ?and are going to wonder what?s going to happen to them... .?Do you get chosen next?? Russell said.

Any action related to a layoff is always closely watched by the remaining employees, Kelleher said.?A?company always needs to evaluate what effect any decision will have on the individuals involved, as well as the organization and the brand, he said.

?Every action has a reaction,? Kelleher said.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/business/two-kansas-city-star-reporters-told-choose-who-gets-laid-1C7573609

temptations work hard play hard tim ferriss wmt human nature arkansas football blackhawks

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Indian Sitarist Ravi Shankar Dies (Voice Of America)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/270194175?client_source=feed&format=rss

brandon carr knicks coach encyclopedia britannica pi white lion mike d antoni resigns holes

How outside money was poured into governors' races

By Paul Abowd and Andrea FullerThe Center for Public Integrity

Despite outraising its Democratic counterpart by a 2-to-1 margin, the Republican Governors Association won only four of 11 races in the 2012 election, a far cry from the success it enjoyed two years ago.

The Washington D.C.-based political organization raised almost $100 million, according to recently released Internal Revenue Service data. The group targeted six states it considered winnable, losing five of them. Democrats won seven of the 11 contests, but the GOP managed to pick up one seat in North Carolina, long held by Democrats.


The top donors to the so-called ?527? organization, which can accept unlimited contributions from billionaires, corporations and unions, are familiar Republican Party patrons ? No. 1 is?Bob Perry, a Texas homebuilder and perennial RGA supporter, who gave $3.25 million. That?s a little more than half of what he gave in 2010.

Billionaire casino magnate Sheldon Adelson is?No. 2, with $3 million in donations between him and his wife. According to the latest Federal Election Commission reports, Adelson is?the top donor to super PACs in?2012, doling out more than $93 million along with his family.

Conservative billionaire David Koch ? who has not made any contributions to?super PACs ??was the organization?s third-highest donor, writing?two checks totaling $2 million. Koch is co-owner of the second-largest privately held company in America, Koch Industries, an energy conglomerate.

Seven of the RGA?s top 10 donors are corporate executives who gave at least $1 million. Two of them, Paul Singer and Kenneth Griffin, are hedge fund managers.

Six of the Democratic Governors Association's top donors were unions. The American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees topped the DGA donors list, giving about $1.3 million. The Service Employees International Union gave about $1.1 million, while the American Federation of Teachers gave at least $772,000.

Top corporate donors to the DGA included pharmaceutical giants Pfizer, which gave almost $700,000, and AstraZeneca, which contributed nearly $600,000. The companies also gave comparable sums to the RGA. The DGA also got corporate support from?health insurer United Healthcare Services Inc., and?AT&T.

The DGA raised nearly $50 million, the organization's "strongest fundraising year ever," according to spokeswoman Kate Hansen.?

'Enormous impact on state elections'
The DGA and RGA have devised national strategies for collecting unlimited funds from unions, corporations, and wealthy individuals, and funneling the money into state races. Both have used networks of state-based PACs to maneuver around various state limits on campaign giving.

?They?ve had an enormous impact on state elections across the nation,? said Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, an election law expert at Stetson Law School. ?In many states they were consistently a top spender.?

The circuitous methods used by both organizations to inject corporate and union cash into state races and mask the identity of its donors have raised legal questions, prompted lawsuits, and tested the capacity of state election boards to enforce limits on outside spending.

Both organizations have told the Center for Public Integrity that they?fully comply with campaign finance laws, and that they report their donors and spending to the IRS.

The RGA set up a federal super PAC called RGA Right Direction, and fed it with $9.8 million in contributions. The super PAC ? another?type of organization that can?accept unlimited donations from individuals and corporations ? then made a?large contribution to Indiana Republican candidate Mike Pence, and bought ads in tight state races in Montana, Washington, New Hampshire, and West Virginia.

Super PACs are normally used to spend money on federal campaigns. By passing the funds through the super PAC, which reported its sole donor as the RGA, the association effectively shielded the identities of the donors who paid for ads in the state races.

In North Carolina, the RGA spent millions of dollars, directly from corporate treasuries to win in a state long?led by Democratic governors. The unlimited contributions from dozens of corporations across the country went toward ads supporting Republican candidate Pat McCrory, who won convincingly over Democratic Lt. Gov. Walter Dalton.

The DGA, too, used a network of state-affiliated PACs, to fund ad campaigns in battleground states like Montana and North Carolina. It was the primary funder of a PAC called North Carolina Citizens for Progress, which purchased ads attacking McCrory.

While America?s wealthiest corporate executives tend to prefer the RGA, and unions give almost exclusively to the DGA, some donors played both sides this election.

Agricultural giant Monsanto, credit card company Visa and health insurance company Humana were large donors to both the RGA and DGA ? each giving about $100,000 to both groups.

Despite the?Republicans' win-loss record, RGA spokesman Michael Schrimpf called 2012 "a successful year by any standard"?with Republicans now in control of governorships in 30 states. Most of those gains, however, came in 2010. The?North Carolina win and the failed effort to recall Scott Walker, Wisconsin's Republican governor, in June, were high points for the GOP this year.

In addition, in five?states targeted by the RGA where it lost, the Democrats held advantages unrelated to fundraising.?

Missouri and West Virginia featured?Democratic incumbents. Three other states ??Montana, Washington and New Hampshire ??had open seats where a Democrat had previously been in power.

The two organizations will put their fundraising powers to the test again in 2013, when Virginia and New Jersey choose their next governors.

Michael Beckel contributed to this report.

The Center for Public Integrity is a non-profit independent investigative news outlet.? For more of its stories go to publicintegrity.org

More from Open Channel:

?

?

Follow Open Channel from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

?

?

Source: http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/12/15847499-how-outside-money-was-poured-into-governors-races?lite

p zynga Tropical Storm Sandy W S B H